Reconstruction of Taconian and Acadian paleostress regimes in the Quebec and northern New Brunswick Appalachians
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A numerical analysis of fault populations was applied in the Quebec and northern New Brunswick Appalachians to characterize paleostress fields attributed to the Taconian and Acadian orogenies. The first brittle deformation documented in the external domain of the Humber Zone is associated with the thin-skinned tectonics of the Taconian orogen. The Taconian brittle deformation, characterized by northsouth to NESW reverse conjugated brittle faults, evolved under a pure shear compressional regime (vertical σ3 axes) with σ1 axes oriented ESEWNW. The ENEWSW dextral and NW-SE sinistral faults that are observed in the St.Lawrence Lowlands are also attributed to Taconian compression. The first brittle deformation recognized in the Dunnage Zone and the Gaspé Belt is attributed to an ESEWNW compression during the Acadian Orogeny. In the Dunnage Zone of southern Quebec, the Acadian paleostress axes are similar to the directions of σ1 axes and to the pure shear compressional regime computed for the Silurian and Devonian rocks of the Gaspé Belt. In the Gaspé Peninsula, the Acadian stresses are oriented ESEWNW and are mechanically compatible with transpressional regimes. Reverse brittle faults and pure shear stress are identified along regional and secondary sets of NESW brittle faults, whereas a strike-slip stress regime is reconstructed along major eastwest faults. In the Humber Zone of the Quebec Appalachians, a second compression is identified. It is characterized by conjugate ENEWSW dextral and NWSE sinistral strike-slip faults that crosscut Taconian thrust faults. This late deformation event is attributed to a distal expression of the Acadian Orogeny.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".