Effectiveness of the Industry Standard Peninsula Technique for Grounding the Neutrals of Shunt Capacitors in High Voltage Substations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The industry standard IEEE C37.99-2000 implicitly recommends the use of peninsula grounding as the preferred method to ground the neutrals of capacitor banks in high voltage substations. The basis for this recommendation is a 1972 IEEE paper by Rogers and Gillies that has remained unchallenged until now. This paper compares the overall performance of a 735/230 kV substation grounding system designed according to the peninsula method and a more conventional design consisting of reasonably dense ground conductors in the 230 kV capacitor banks area and concludes that the conventional design offers superior performance both from a safety and EMI perspective. Although the analysis was conducted based on the full back-to-back capacitor switching transient current discharge, this paper focuses on the performance as computed based on the main resonant frequency due to the extent of the main results to be presented. A future paper will report the results of the transient analysis and will discuss resonance conditions that were observed at frequencies around 100 kHz
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".