MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108322289

Two Phase Flow Boiling Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop of Two New LGWP Developmental Refrigerants Alternative to R-410A

2014· article· en· W2108322289 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jeremy Ryan Smith, Lorenzo Cremaschi

Bibliographic record

VenuePurdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRefrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefrigerantThermodynamicsPressure dropHeat transferAir source heat pumpsHeat transfer coefficientChemistryHeat exchanger
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To meet the terms of the Montreal Protocol, CFCs and HCFCs have been gradually phased out and they have been replaced by refrigerants that have zero ozone depletion potential. However, some of these fluids, such as R-410A, have global warming potential (GWP) that might still be of concern from an environmental perspective in case of leakage or improper charge management. Few studies of refrigerants that have zero ozone depletion potential and GWP less than 500 are available in the literature. Preliminary findings from these studies suggested that new development refrigerants were viable options. System COP and capacity were promising but there is not much information on the heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics of these low GWP refrigerants. This paper contributes to address this gap and provides new data for the two phase flow boiling heat transfer coefficient (HTC) and pressure drop of two new low GWP developmental refrigerant alternatives for R-410A. Heat transfer measurements were conducted for a copper tube commonly used in direct expansion evaporators of air conditioning systems with a 9.5 mm (0.375 in.) outside diameter and internally enhanced micro-finned surface. Data of local two phase flow HTC and pressure drop are presented for refrigerants R-410A, R-32, R-1234yf and the two new developmental refrigerants referred to as DR-5 and DR-5A. The experimental findings from this work indicated that the refrigerant R-32 had similar and slightly higher heat transfer coefficient than that of R-410A at same refrigerant mass flux and similar heat flux conditions on the outer surface of the tube. Refrigerant R-1234yf had about 15 to 20% lower heat transfer coefficient than R410-A at 4?C saturation temperature. For this saturation temperature the developmental refrigerants DR-5 and DR-5A had heat transfer coefficients between R-32 and R-1234yf when the vapor quality ranged from 0.2 to 0.7. An increase of the saturation temperature from 4°C to 9°C decreased the heat transfer coefficients for all of the refrigerants tested. The two phase flow boiling pressure drops increased monotonically if the vapor quality of the refrigerant increased. The pressure drops of refrigerant R-410A were the lowest while the pressure drop for refrigerant R-1234yf were the highest measured among the fluids investigated. The developmental refrigerants DR-5 and DR-5A showed identical characteristics in terms of pressure drop at both saturation temperatures of 4°C and 9°C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.187
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePurdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System)Same topicRefrigeration and Air Conditioning TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207