MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108399445 · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.10.002

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Is Associated with a Variant in Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein 1

2011· article· en· W2108399445 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew J. Bown, Gregory T. Jones, Seamus C. Harrison, Benjamin J. Wright, Suzannah Bumpstead, Annette F. Baas, Sólveig Grétarsdóttir, Stephen A. Badger, Declan Bradley, K G Burnand, Anne H. Child, Rachel E. Clough, Gillian Cockerill, Hany Hafez, Daniel Scott, Simon Futers, Toby Johnson, Soroush Sohrabi, Alberto Smith, Matthew M. Thompson, Frank M. van Bockxmeer, Matthew Waltham, Stefán E. Matthíasson, Guðmar Þorleifsson, Unnur Thorsteinsdottir, Jan D. Blankensteijn, Joep A.W. Teijink, Cisca Wijmenga, Jacqueline de Graaf, Lambertus A. Kiemeney, Themistocles L. Assimes, Ruth McPherson, Lasse Folkersen, Anders Franco‐Cereceda, Jutta Palmen, Andrew J. Smith, Nicolas Sylvius, Mette Refstrup, Sarah Edkins, Rhian Gwilliam, Sarah Hunt, Simon Potter, Jes S. Lindholt, Ruth Frikke‐Schmidt, Anne Tybjærg‐Hansen, Anne E. Hughes, Jonathan Golledge, Paul E. Norman, André van Rij, Janet T. Powell, Per Eriksson, Kāri Stefánsson, John R. Thompson, Steve E. Humphries, Panos Deloukas, Nilesh J. Samani

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Human Genetics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAortic aneurysm repair treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersVetenskapsrådetHjärt-LungfondenMedical Research CouncilPublic Health AgencyHealth Research Council of New ZealandOffice of Health and Medical ResearchNational Health and Medical Research CouncilEuropean CommissionNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchBritish Heart FoundationWellcome Trust
KeywordsAbdominal aortic aneurysmLDL receptorInternal medicineCardiologyAneurysmMedicineLipoproteinLow-density lipoproteinRadiologyCholesterol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality and has a significant heritability. We carried out a genome-wide association discovery study of 1866 patients with AAA and 5435 controls and replication of promising signals (lead SNP with a p value < 1 × 10(-5)) in 2871 additional cases and 32,687 controls and performed further follow-up in 1491 AAA and 11,060 controls. In the discovery study, nine loci demonstrated association with AAA (p < 1 × 10(-5)). In the replication sample, the lead SNP at one of these loci, rs1466535, located within intron 1 of low-density-lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1) demonstrated significant association (p = 0.0042). We confirmed the association of rs1466535 and AAA in our follow-up study (p = 0.035). In a combined analysis (6228 AAA and 49182 controls), rs1466535 had a consistent effect size and direction in all sample sets (combined p = 4.52 × 10(-10), odds ratio 1.15 [1.10-1.21]). No associations were seen for either rs1466535 or the 12q13.3 locus in independent association studies of coronary artery disease, blood pressure, diabetes, or hyperlipidaemia, suggesting that this locus is specific to AAA. Gene-expression studies demonstrated a trend toward increased LRP1 expression for the rs1466535 CC genotype in arterial tissues; there was a significant (p = 0.029) 1.19-fold (1.04-1.36) increase in LRP1 expression in CC homozygotes compared to TT homozygotes in aortic adventitia. Functional studies demonstrated that rs1466535 might alter a SREBP-1 binding site and influence enhancer activity at the locus. In conclusion, this study has identified a biologically plausible genetic variant associated specifically with AAA, and we suggest that this variant has a possible functional role in LRP1 expression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations213
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Human GeneticsSame topicAortic aneurysm repair treatmentsFrench-language works237,207