Le leadership distribué : l’épreuve des réformes éducatives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les changements entrepris il y a plus de dix ans au Québec visent à assouplir le fonctionnement organisationnel des institutions éducatives et reposent sur le développement de l’autonomie professionnelle du personnel scolaire. On s’intéresse ici à l’actualisation d’un leadership distribué dans les établissements scolaires en se demandant si ce leadership a été favorisé ou endigué par les dernières réformes. Sur la base d’études quantitatives et d’études de cas, le texte aboutit à deux éléments de réponse. D’une part, les réformes organisationnelles semblent avoir offert des conditions favorables à la distribution de l’influence au sein des écoles et au développement d’une coresponsabilité dans la gestion des établissements. D’autre part, cependant, l’analyse de l’activité réelle des directeurs et directrices montre que cette actualisation d’un leadership distribué rencontre de nombreux obstacles que le texte s’efforce d’identifier et d’interpréter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".