MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Elastoplastic Confinement Model for Circular Concrete Columns

2007· article· en· W2108455505 on OpenAlexaff
Rami Eid, Avraham N. Dancygier, Patrick Paultre

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Structural Engineering · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColumn (typography)ReinforcementStructural engineeringYield (engineering)Materials scienceTube (container)Reinforced concreteRange (aeronautics)Stress (linguistics)Simple (philosophy)MechanicsComposite materialEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents relatively simple, analytically derived curves to model the axial and the lateral stress-strain relations of circular concrete columns. The analytical curves describe the full elastoplastic behavior of the confined concrete column. The solution to the partially confined reinforced concrete column in the elastoplastic range is derived by replacing the discrete lateral reinforcement with an equivalent tube and the Drucker–Prager (DP) yield criterion is applied to represent the concrete behavior in the plastic range. Application of the DP model does not require an iterative procedure in order to solve the problem and thus an explicit solution is obtained. It is shown that the proposed model properly simulates the behavior of reinforced concrete columns partially confined by steel ties and of columns that are fully confined by fiber-reinforced polymer sheets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Structural EngineeringSame topicStructural Behavior of Reinforced ConcreteFrench-language works237,207