MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108461205 · doi:10.1109/acc.2007.4282467

A Combined Spectral Subtraction and Wavelet De-Noising Method for Bearing Fault Diagnosis

2007· article· en· W2108461205 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... American Control Conference/Proceedings of the American Control Conference · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWaveletWavelet packet decompositionSecond-generation wavelet transformStationary wavelet transformWavelet transformCascade algorithmLifting schemeDiscrete wavelet transformComputer scienceMathematicsGabor waveletArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Algorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the Gabor wavelet is used for wavelet filter based de-noising the vibration signal measured from faulty bearings. In this approach the parameters of the daughter wavelet corresponding to center frequency and bandwidth namely scale and shape-factor should be selected properly. The ratio of the geometric mean to the arithmetic mean of the wavelet coefficient moduli called smoothness index is used as a measure for the selection of these parameters. As bandpass filtering does not eliminate the in-band noise with frequency content on the range covered by the daughter wavelet, spectral subtraction technique is applied prior to wavelet transforming the signal. This has significantly improved the performance of the wavelet filter based de- noising method. Results are presented for both simulated and experimental data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.279
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it