La perception de la confiance informationnelle
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En nous appuyant sur les ecrits portant sur la confiance, nous proposons la notion de confiance informationnelle. Les criteres de qualite et de valeur de l’information pourraient permettre d’en observer les manifestations en contexte organisationnel. La confiance peut influencer les comportements informationnels en matiere de recherche et d’utilisation d’information, tout comme les pratiques documentaires utilisees pour gerer les documents d’activites dans le cadre des processus metiers. Nous illustrons ces propositions avec les resultats d’une etude de comportements informationnels portant sur des cadres intermediaires d’une municipalite canadienne. Nous cherchons a comprendre la dynamique entre la perception de la confiance informationnelle, les comportements informationnels et les pratiques documentaires privilegiees par ces cadres, de meme que les resultats de cette dynamique sur la gouvernance de l’information dans l’organisation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.057 | 0.047 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it