Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This is the following-up study of 'A Comparative Study on The Barrier Free Dwelling Guidelines of Domestic and Foreign countries. -Focused on Entrance, Bedroom and living room-' published in the Journal of The Korea Institute of Healthcare Architecture in February, 2010, and the scope of the study was limited to kitchens, baths and toilets. Regarding barrier-free dwellings, the national standards operated by Foreign Eight countries -the United States, Germany, Canada, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, Australia, Japan, and China, were investigated and compared. Also, they were analyzed on the basis of 'KS P 1509 (Principle and recommendation for designing dimension of dwelling in consideration of the elderly)', and the commonness and difference about national standards between foreign and domestic countries were clarified. Accordingly, when designing barrier-free dwellings, the characteristics and commonness of design guidelines between countries, and the degree of similarity to domestic standards could be known more specifically. Therefore, it is thought that this study will help to supplement and improve the Korean standards of barrier-free dwelling architecture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it