MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108594326 · doi:10.21083/nrsc.v0i8.3502

Lessons from the Edge of the Stage: The Tintamarre Project

2015· article· fr· W2108594326 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Alex Fancy

Bibliographic record

VenueNouvelle Revue Synergies Canada · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheatre and Performance Studies
Canadian institutionsMount Allison University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La conférence plénière (en anglais) du professeur Alex Fancy prononcée le 2 avril 2013 à l'université de Guelph dans le cadre du deuxième colloque international en didactique des langues secondes. Foundateur et directeur de la compagnie de théâtre Tintamarre, Alex Fancy propose 15 leçons apprises par le biais d’une méthode singulière: la création annuelle d’une pièce de théâtre bilingue avec un groupe d’étudiant(e)s de l’université Mount Allison au Nouveau Brunswick, Canada. Professor Alex Fancy's keynote address at the Second International Conference on Second-language Pedagogy at the University of Guelph. Founder and director of the Tintamarre theatre company, Alex Fancy shares 15 lessons learned by way of a unique method: the creation of an annual play with a group of students from Mount Allison University in New Brunswick, Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.387
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNouvelle Revue Synergies CanadaSame topicTheatre and Performance StudiesFrench-language works237,207