MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108637262 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2008.4649831

3D prostate segmentation based on ellipsoid fitting, image tapering and warping

2008· article· en· W2108637262 on OpenAlexaff
S. Sara Mahdavi, Septimiu E. Salcudean

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMedical Image Segmentation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImage warpingSegmentationArtificial intelligenceImage segmentationEllipseComputer visionComputer scienceEllipsoidProstateMathematicsMedicineGeometryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a 3D semi-automatic prostate segmentation method for B-mode trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) images. Segmentation is based on prior knowledge of the prostate transversal section shape which is assumed to be a tapered ellipse. The approach consists of an initial untapering and warping of the image to make the shape of the prostate approximately elliptical. The prostate contour is found in the untapered, warped images by edge detection and 2D/3D ellipsoidal curve fitting, performed by solving convex optimization problem. This leads to an average total segmentation duration of 7.42s which is more than 40 times faster than manual segmentation. Clinical studies carried out on 58 prostate volume studies show a volume sensitivity and accuracy of approximately 94% and 73% respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207