THE STEREOCHEMISTRY AND CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF INTERSTITIAL COMPLEXES IN URANYL-OXYSALT MINERALS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The crystal structures and chemical compositions of uranyl-oxysalt minerals (primarily with sheet structural units) are interpreted in terms of the binary representation – bond-valence approach to the structure and chemistry of oxysalts. There is a coherent relation between the average basicity of the structural unit and [CN in ], the average number of bonds to oxygen atoms of the structural unit from the interstitial complex and adjacent structural units. This relation allows calculation of the range of Lewis basicity for specific structural units. The Lewis acidity of an interstitial complex is expressed graphically as a function of the amounts and coordination numbers of monovalent, divalent and trivalent interstitial cations and the amount of interstitial transformer (H 2 O) groups. The range in Lewis basicity for a specific structural unit may also be expressed graphically, and where there is overlap of the Lewis acidity and Lewis basicity, the valence-matching principle is satisfied, and the details of the possible interstitial complexes can be derived. There are three distinct types of interstitial (H 2 O) groups: transformer, non-transformer and inverse-transformer. Inverse-transformer (H 2 O) groups accept three bonds from cations, other (H 2 O) groups and (OH) groups of the structural unit. Their occurrence is rare and is limited to minerals with low bond-valence distribution factors. Detailed predictions of the number of transformer, non-transformer and inverse-transformer (H 2 O) groups in the minerals of the meta-autunite, uranophane, phosphuranylite, carnotite, zippeite and uranyl-hydroxy-hydrate groups (and synthetic analogues) are in good agreement with the observed chemical compositions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".