MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108649120 · doi:10.1088/1464-4266/7/4/004

Optical pumping and electromagnetically induced transparency in a lithium vapour

2005· article· en· W2108649120 on OpenAlex
F. Magnus, Adrian Boatwright, A Flodin, R. C. Shiell

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Optics B Quantum and Semiclassical Optics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum optics and atomic interactions
Canadian institutionsTrent University
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
KeywordsElectromagnetically induced transparencyAtomic physicsPhysicsLinear polarizationResonance (particle physics)Circular polarizationLine (geometry)Inert gasOpticsMolecular physicsMaterials scienceLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the first study of electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) on the D1 and D2 lines of 7Li in a vapour cell. The effect of different polarizations, background gas pressures and experimental designs on the dark resonance are examined. It is found that EIT is more prominent on the D1 line than on the D2 line and is present at the D2 transition under incident orthogonal linearly polarized fields and parallel circularly polarized fields, but absent for parallel linearly polarized fields and for orthogonal circularly polarized fields. It is shown that the contrast of the dark resonances can be affected by the presence of an inert background gas. An analysis of a further nine resonances observed at the D1 transition and three resonances at the D2 transition is presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it