MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108667660 · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-487

Relationship between genome and epigenome - challenges and requirements for future research

2014· letter· en· W2108667660 on OpenAlexaff
Geneviève Almouzni, Lucia Altucci, Bruno Amati, Neil Ashley, David C. Baulcombe, Nathalie Beaujean, Christoph Bock, Erik Bongcam‐Rudloff, Jean Bousquet, Sigurd Braun, Brigitte Bressac–de Paillerets, Marion J.G. Bussemakers, Laura Clarke, Ana Conesa, Xavier Estivill, Alireza Fazeli, Neža Grgurevič, Marta Gut, Bastiaan T. Heijmans, Sylvie Hermouet, Jeanine J. Houwing‐Duistermaat, Ilaria Iacobucci, Janez Ilaš, Raju Kandimalla, Susanne Krauss‐Etschmann, Paul Lasko, Anders M. Lindroth, Gregor Majdič, Éric Marcotte, Giovanni Martinelli, Nadine Martinet, Éric Meyer, Cristina Miceli, Ken Mills, María Moreno‐Villanueva, Ghislaine Morvan-Dubois, Dörthe Nickel, Beate Niesler, Mariusz Nowacki, J Nowak, Stephan Ossowski, Mattia Pelizzola, Roland Pochet, Uroš Potočnik, Magdalena Radwanska, Jeroen Raes, Magnus Rattray, Mark D. Robinson, Bernard A.J. Roelen, Sascha Sauer, Dieter Schinzer, P. Eline Slagboom, Tim D. Spector, Hendrik G. Stunnenberg, Ekaterini Tiligada, Maria‐Elena Torres‐Padilla, Roula Tsonaka, Ann Van Soom, Melita Vidaković, Martin Widschwendter

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Genomics · 2014
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpigenomeEpigeneticsDiseaseSet (abstract data type)BiologyGenomeData scienceGeneticsComputer scienceDNA methylationMedicineGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding the links between genetic, epigenetic and non-genetic factors throughout the lifespan and across generations and their role in disease susceptibility and disease progression offer entirely new avenues and solutions to major problems in our society. To overcome the numerous challenges, we have come up with nine major conclusions to set the vision for future policies and research agendas at the European level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.032
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.049
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.171

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0320.049
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.016
Scholarly communication0.0070.018
Open science0.0050.007
Research integrity0.0390.053
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.197
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC GenomicsSame topicEpigenetics and DNA MethylationFrench-language works237,207