MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108685474 · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-1127-3

Molecular Pathology Shows p16 Methylation in Nonadenomatous Pituitaries from Patients with Cushing’s Disease

2004· article· en· W2108685474 on OpenAlexfundno aff
David J. Simpson, Anne Couvelard, David C. Murray, Adil Bahar, Helen Turner, John Wass, Margaret M. Esiri, Richard N. Clayton, William E. Farrell

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of California, Los AngelesTrent University
KeywordsCorticotropic cellMethylationCpG siteAdenomaHyperplasiaDNA methylationCushing's diseaseBiologyPathologyEndocrinologyInternal medicineImmunohistochemistryPituitary glandMedicineDiseaseGeneGene expressionHormoneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: The majority of cases of Cushing's disease are due to the presence of a corticotroph microadenoma. Less frequently no adenoma is found and histology shows either corticotroph hyperplasia, or apparently normal pituitary. In this study we have used molecular pathology to determine whether the tissue labeled histologically as "normal" is indeed abnormal. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Tissue from 31 corticotroph adenomas and 16 nonadenomatous pituitaries were subject to methylation-sensitive PCR to determine the methylation status of the p16 gene CpG island. The proportion of methylated versus unmethylated CpG island was determined using combined bisulphite restriction analysis. Methylation status was correlated with immunohistochemical detection of p16. RESULTS: Seventeen of 31 adenomas (54.8%), 4 of 6 cases of corticotroph hyperplasia, and 7 of 10 apparently normal pituitaries showed p16 methylation. Ten of 14 (71%; P = 0.01) adenomas and 2 of 3 cases of corticotroph hyperplasia, which were methylated, failed to express p16 protein. However, only 2 of 7 apparently normal pituitaries that were methylated failed to express p16 protein. Quantitative analysis of methylation using combined bisulphite restriction analysis showed only unmethylated CpG islands in postmortem normal pituitaries; however, in adenomas 80-90% of the cells within a specimen were methylated. The reverse was true for corticotroph hyperplasia and apparently normal pituitaries where only 10-20% of the cells were methylated. Thus, the decreased proportion of cells that were methylated, particularly in those cases of apparently normal pituitary, is the most likely explanation for the lack of association between this change and loss of cognate protein in these cases. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge this is the first report that describes an intrinsic molecular change, namely methylation of the p16 gene CpG island, common to all three histological patterns associated with Cushing's disease. Thus, the use of molecular pathology reveals abnormalities undetected by routine pathological investigation. In cases of "apparently" normal pituitaries it is not possible to determine whether the change is associated with adenoma cells "scattered" throughout the gland, albeit few in number, or with the ancestor-clonal origin of these tumor cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicPituitary Gland Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207