MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108704169 · doi:10.1016/j.crohns.2010.11.002

Development of testicular germ cell cancer following successful infliximab induction therapy for ulcerative colitis

2010· article· en· W2108704169 on OpenAlexaff
John C.T. Wong, Brian Bressler, Baljinder Salh, Eric M. Yoshida, Nazira Chatur

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInfliximabUlcerative colitisInflammatory bowel diseaseTesticular cancerCancerGastroenterologyInternal medicinePopulationBiopsyDiseaseImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Antitumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) agents have substantially altered the management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Their benefits must however be weighed against increased risks for infections, lymphoma, and possibly other malignancies. We report on a 27-year-old man, with a six-year history of ulcerative colitis maintained on mesalamine suppositories, presenting with clinical, radiographic and biopsy evidence of an acute colitis flare. Due to the refractory nature of his disease, infliximab was started, resulting in induction of remission within six weeks. Three months after the first dose of infliximab, the patient was diagnosed with a testicular mixed germ cell tumor requiring orchiectomy. Four cases of testicular cancer development among patients using anti-TNFα agents have been identified. Given the prevalence of IBD in young men and recent suggestions for "top-down therapy," testicular cancer as a potential complication of anti-TNFα agents should be further explored on a population basis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and ColitisSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207