Ferromagnetic nanowire (FMNW) self-biased H-plane resonance isolator
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A novel resonant type H-plane isolator based on a ferromagnetic nanowire (FMNW) slab is presented. As a result of the remanence property of FMNW materials, the device is self-biased and therefore does not require any magnet. Moreover, the structure does not suffer from the conventional H-plane isolator drawback of demagnetization, which renders this configuration, characterized by superior heat dissipation capability, a competitive alternative to the E-plane resonance isolator. The inherent remanence of the FMNW material makes the shorter double and quadruple slab configurations more practical than their conventional ferrite counterparts. The proposed device is very compact, lightweight, and low-cost. Simulations based on two different methods, the finite integration technique (FIT) and the finite element method (FEM), predict an isolation of over 20 dB and insertion loss of less than 1 dB for a relatively high band width of 6 GHz at the center frequency of 20 GHz.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".