A Self-Organized Network for Load Balancing Using Intelligent Distributed Antenna System [4pt]Un réseau auto-organisé pour l’équilibrage de charge utilisant un système intelligent d’antennes distribuées
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A high call-blocking rate is a consequence of an inefficient utilization of system resources, which is often caused by a load imbalance in the network. Load imbalances are common in wireless networks with a large number of cellular users. This paper investigates a load-balancing scheme for mobile networks that optimizes cellular performance with constraints of physical resource limits and users' quality of service demands. In order to efficiently utilize the system resources, an intelligent distributed antenna system (IDAS) fed by a multibase transceiver station (BTS) has the ability to distribute the system resources over a given geographic area. To enable load balancing among distributed antenna modules, we dynamically allocate the remote antenna modules to the BTSs using an intelligent algorithm. A self-organized network (SON) for an IDAS is formulated as an integer-based linear-constrained optimization problem, which tries to balance the load among the BTSs. An estimation distribution algorithm (EDA) as an evolutionary algorithm is proposed to solve the optimization problem. The computational results of the EDA algorithm demonstrate optimum performance for small-scale networks and near-optimum performance for large-scale networks. The EDA algorithm is faster with marginally less complexity than an exhaustive search algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".