Protein Matrix and Dielectric Effect in Cytochromec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of the protein matrix on the standard potential of a buried redox center has been investigated by using a selection of mutants and chemical derivatives in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cytochrome c isoform 1. Assuming only local structural perturbation and no alteration of the iron-ligation chemistry, Delta E(m)(0)' can be regarded as a measure of the difference in polypeptide solvation of the heme charge, which reflects the dielectric properties of the protein. The evaluation of an apparent dielectric constant (U(exp)/U(theo)) yields variable, and sometimes even negative, values if U(exp) = Delta G(0)redox. However, some consistent result are observed if U(exp) = Delta H(0)redox, with a measured epsilon(Delta Delta)(H)(redox) = 19 +/- 6. The variability is thus attributed to an entropic factor (epsilon(Delta Delta)(S)(redox)) that is investigated using a series of substitutions of Asn(52) and/or Tyr(67). In double mutants Y67F/N52I Y67F/N52V, where most of the hydrogen bond network in the heme crevice is eliminated, Delta S(redox) compares to the wild type. This indicates that a fully consistent hydrogen bond network has a similar polarizability as an apolar matrix. We therefore argue that the variability in net dielectric susceptibility arises from conformational polarizability, a factor that is not a function of atomic properties and coordinates and is therefore hard to predict using conventional physical relationships.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".