MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108735817 · doi:10.5376/ijms.2013.03.0006

Integrating Anthropogenic and Climatic Factors in the Assessment of the Caribbean Spiny Lobster (<i>Panulirus argus</i>) in Cuba: Implications for Fishery Management

2013· article· en· W2108735817 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Marine Science · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCrustacean biology and ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPanulirus argusSpiny lobsterFisheryGeographyBiologyCrustacean

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Caribbean spiny lobster Panulirus argus , the most valuable Cuban fishery resource, is managed with a set of input and biological controls. The aim of this article was to integrate two indices related water and nutrients supply and tropical cyclones activity in the stock assessment, through internal estimation of the parameters of a spawning stock recruitment function in a statistical catch-at-age analysis. The population dynamics model allowed estimating key Reference Points for management at fixed levels of fishing mortality rate and environmental conditions. The results indicate that the reduction of recruitment and catches in the Cuban spiny lobster fishery could be a result of synergistic cumulative effects because of the anthropogenic reduction of nutrients supplies and the increase of the potential destructiveness of tropical cyclones since 1994, mainly from 2001 on. Although the degradation of the coastal habitat quality in Cuba is apparent and perhaps unavoidable, the assessment of the impact allows implementing management actions for the spiny lobster fishery sustainability. The implementation of annual TAC depending on the stock status, have maintained the fishery around the more conservative Reference Points F 40% and F 0.1 during the current unfavorable environment period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.257

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Marine ScienceSame topicCrustacean biology and ecologyFrench-language works237,207