MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108740991 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2008.4518175

Constrained linear least squares approach for TDOA localization: A global optimum solution

2008· article· en· W2108740991 on OpenAlexaff
Yifeng Zhou, Louise Lamont

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultilaterationMathematical optimizationLeast-squares function approximationCommon emitterComputer scienceTotal least squaresLinear least squaresNoise (video)AlgorithmNon-linear least squaresGeneralized least squaresQuadratic growthMathematicsEstimation theoryStatisticsEngineeringElectronic engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we formulate the time-difference-of-arrival (TDOA) emitter localization problem as a quadratically constrained linear least squares problem. We show that the constrained least squares problem has a unique global minimum and develop a computationally efficient algorithm for finding the emitter location estimates that corresponds to the global minimum. The approach is robust and more resilient to moderate and large sensor measurement noise than other existing TDOA location techniques. Computer simulations are used to demonstrate the effectiveness and performance of the proposed algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the ... IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal ProcessingSame topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207