MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Time for More Emphasis on Nausea?

2015· article· en· W2108757112 on OpenAlexaff
Terry L. Ng, Brian Hutton, Mark Clemons

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Oncologist · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNausea and vomiting management
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntiemeticMedicineNauseaChemotherapy-induced nausea and vomitingVomitingIntensive care medicineChemotherapyQuality of life (healthcare)AnesthesiaInternal medicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite advances in antiemetic therapy, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) remains the most feared and expected side effect of chemotherapy. Optimization of antiemetic therapy is important because CINV can lead to reduced quality of life, increased use of health care resources, and compromised treatment adherence. The evidence illustrates how antiemetic recommendations have evolved and raises ongoing issues and controversies in the management of CINV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.008
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations93
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe OncologistSame topicNausea and vomiting managementFrench-language works237,207