MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108775423 · doi:10.1145/1089803.1089991

Virtual backbone based on MCDS for topology control in wireless ad hoc networks

2005· article· en· W2108775423 on OpenAlexaff
Kais Mnif, Bo Rong, Michel Kadoch

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Ad Hoc Networks
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConnected dominating setComputer scienceWireless ad hoc networkFlooding (psychology)Computer networkBackbone networkTopology controlRelayDistributed computingVehicular ad hoc networkCluster analysisBandwidth (computing)Wireless networkWirelessTopology (electrical circuits)GraphTheoretical computer scienceKey distribution in wireless sensor networksEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes to utilize virtual backbone to handle control messages in ad hoc networks. The virtual backbone is built by using the Minimum Connected Dominating Set (MCDS) on a graph. The first part of this paper presents a new algorithm to construct the MCDS. The construction of the MCDS is formulated using the linear programming approach. We compared the performance of this procedure with those other previous approaches, and we find that our approach is less complex and gives the nearest solution to the optimal one. The second part of this paper presents different techniques of diffusion in ad hoc networks such as flooding, clustering, MP relay, and backbone based on MCDS, etc. The flooding technique is simple and efficient, but it is expensive in term of bandwidth, and causes excessive flows of message etc. Simulation results show that the approach of virtual backbone based MCDS outperforms flooding and MP relay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.756

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Ad Hoc NetworksFrench-language works237,207