Entre la oumma, l’ethnicité et la culture : le rapport à l’islam chez les musulmans francophones de Montréal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au Québec, la migration croissante de musulmans donne à voir un islam pluriel. Néanmoins, depuis septembre 2001, la question identitaire se pose avec plus d’acuité pour les musulmans d’Amérique du Nord. Ce contexte couplé au maintien quotidien de liens hors du territoire local et à l’avènement de nouveaux acteurs internationaux favorisent un sentiment d’appartenir à uneoummauniverselle, appartenance non pour autant détachée d’un rapport au territoire local ou d’origine. À partir d’une recherche sur les pratiques sociales et rituelles de musulmans Libanais, Ouest-Africains et Maghrébins de Montréal, nous argumentons que la sociabilité de ces populations s’articule entre religion, ethnicité et culture. En examinant les pratiques communautaires ainsi que les dynamiques de transmission identitaire aux enfants et de définition des frontières symboliques des groupes, nous exposons la diversité des stratégies identitaires et réfutons la présence d’un islam essentialisé en contexte montréalais.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".