MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108808757 · doi:10.1109/tnano.2010.2066573

Threshold Voltage Variations Make Full Adders Reliabilities Similar

2010· article· en· W2108808757 on OpenAlexaff
Walid Ibrahim, Valeriu Beiu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLow-power high-performance VLSI design
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdderRedundancy (engineering)Reliability (semiconductor)Computer scienceCMOSLogic gateElectronic engineeringCircuit reliabilityTransistorThreshold voltageReliability engineeringArithmeticVoltageElectrical engineeringEngineeringPower (physics)AlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Addition is the most widely used arithmetic operation in digital applications. The reliability of full adder (FA) cells is crucial as they affect arithmetic logic and floating-point units, as well as cache/memory address calculations. This letter studies the reliability of five different FA designs. The analysis starts from the device level by estimating the effects threshold voltage variations will have on the reliability of scaled CMOS transistors. These estimations will then be used to calculate the reliability of the sum and carry_out signals. This letter will also briefly explore the effects of increasing the reliability of devices and of using gate-level redundancy schemes on the reliability of FAs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on NanotechnologySame topicLow-power high-performance VLSI designFrench-language works237,207