Les musulmans en France : religiosité, politisation et capital social
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Des signes convergents incitent à penser que les populations issues de l’immigration musulmane présentent un degré de religiosité relativement élevé, échappant de ce fait au processus de sécularisation qui caractérise la plupart des pays européens. À partir de l’enquête Trajectoires et Origines (TeO), réalisée en France auprès d’un vaste échantillon d’immigrés et de descendants d’immigrés, cet article vise à vérifier ce constat tout en essayant de mieux cerner l’univers social et politique des musulmans. Les données indiquent qu’une dynamique de retour vers le religieux est manifestement à l’oeuvre et que cette dynamique ne s’explique pas uniquement par les difficultés sociales et les discriminations, mais qu’elle doit être resituée dans un processus global de socialisation politique où se mêlent les aspects culturels et idéologiques. L’article se conclut par une lecture critique de l’enquête TeO, dont le questionnaire reste marqué par des présupposés qui empêchent d’analyser toutes les dimensions de l’intégration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".