MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108824747 · doi:10.1520/jai101111

Mechanical Properties of Zr-2.5Nb Pressure Tubes Made from Electrolytic Powder

2007· article· en· W2108824747 on OpenAlexaffabout
C.E. Coleman, M. Griffiths, V. Grigoriev, Vladimir Kiseliov, B. S. Rodchenkov, В. А. Маркелов

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of ASTM International · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNuclear Materials and Properties
Canadian institutionsAtomic Energy (Canada)Canadian Nuclear Laboratories
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceMicrostructureUltimate tensile strengthAlloyMetallurgyComposite materialPhase (matter)Equiaxed crystalsAnnealing (glass)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Pressure tubes in CANDUCANada Deuterium Uranium (CANDU) is a registered trademark of Atomic Energy of Canada Limited and RBMK reactors are fabricated from Zr-2.5Nb alloy. This paper describes the mechanical properties of tubes used in power reactors made by four routes using electrolytic powder as the base material. The microstructures developed by each route are distinct: CW: cold-worked material consists of flattened α-Zr grains surrounded by a skin of β-Zr phase; used in CANDU 6 reactors. CW-A: material that was cold-worked and annealed at 540°C contains elongated α-Zr grains mixed with equiaxed α-Zr grains and particles of β-Nb phase; used in all RBMK 1000 reactors. TMT-1: material quenched from the (α+β)-Zr phase into water follow by cold-working consists of α′-phase and between 10 and 20 % of untransformed α-phase; used in RBMK 1500, Ignalina 1. TMT-2: material quenched from the (α+β)-phase into argon-helium gas mixture followed by cold-working consists of Widmanstätten α-phase and untransformed α-phase. This material is used in RBMK 1500, Ignalina 2. The CW and TMT-2 tubes have a higher proportion of grains with basal plane normals in the transverse direction, FT of 0.52 to 0.57, than in the radial direction, FR of 0.38, while quenched and annealed materials (TMT-1 and CW-A) have similar values of FT and FR, about 0.38 in quenched materials and 0.41 in annealed materials. Transverse tensile strength, crack growth resistance, dJ/da, and axial crack velocity, VH, of delayed hydride cracking (DHC) were evaluated, using standard techniques, between 250 and 300°C on as-fabricated materials. In-reactor creep deformation was evaluated from measurements of tube diameter in RBMK 1000s, RBMK 1500s and two CANDU 6 power reactors. Strength and crack growth resistance were measured on TMT-1 and TMT-2 tubes removed from Ignalina NPP Units 1 and 2 after 12–17 years of in-reactor service. As-received cold-worked material had the highest strength; the annealed material had the lowest strength while the quenched materials had intermediate strength. Irradiation increased the strength by about 200 MPa in all four materials. Although DHC is sensitive to texture and the distribution of the β-Zr phase, the dominating factor controlling crack velocity appears to be material strength: with an increase of strength by a factor of about two, VH increased by a factor of 30. Since harmful trace elements were well controlled during manufacturing, other factors affecting crack growth resistance could be assessed. Again, strength appeared important; dJ/da declined approximately linearly with increase in strength induced by irradiation, decreasing from about 350 to 100 MPa as the strength increased from about 250 to 850 MPa. The exception was TMT-2 material where crack growth resistance was maintained after irradiation. TMT-2 material also had good diametral creep resistance in-reactor, attributed to both its texture and grain structure. The other three materials had similar creep resistance controlled mostly by their texture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of ASTM InternationalSame topicNuclear Materials and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207