MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108861046 · doi:10.1098/rsta.2000.0654

An introduction to the spectroscopy of H<sub>3</sub><sup>+</sup>

2000· article· en· W2108861046 on OpenAlexaff
J. K. G. Watson

Bibliographic record

VenuePhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsSteacie Institute for Molecular Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUranusAnharmonicityPhysicsSpectral lineHamiltonian (control theory)SpectroscopyAb initioIsotopomersSupernovaOuter planetsInfrared spectroscopyPlanetAtomic physicsAstrophysicsAstronomyQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The infrared spectra of H3+ and D3 were first observed almost simultaneously in 1980. Since then there has been extensive laboratory work on H3 and its D-isotopomers. In addition, the spectrum of H3+ has been observed in emission from the atmospheres of the giant planets Jupiter, Saturn and Uranus, and probably from the supernova SN1987A, and recently in absorption in interstellar clouds. In this introductory paper, the assignment of the spectra and some of the characteristic features associated with the strong anharmonicity are discussed. As the convergence of the perturbation series is poor, the large centrifugal effects are best calculated in a variational type of approach, where the rotational energy in the Hamiltonian can be treated essentially exactly. Ab initio calculations have steadily improved over the years, and recent work has given completely theoretical vibration–rotation term values for the low vibrational states with an accuracy better than 0.1 cm-1 in almost all cases, adequate for most spectroscopic assignment purposes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score0.358

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering SciencesSame topicSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207