MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108876258 · doi:10.1086/423226

Agency, Embodiment, and Scrupulous Women** Dyan  Elliott, <i>Proving Woman: Female Spirituality and Inquisitional Culture in the Later Middle Ages</i>. (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2004), 368 pp., $24.95;R. Marie  Griffith, <i>Born Again Bodies: Flesh and Spirit in American Christianity</i>. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2004), 304 pp., $55.00;Saba  Mahmood, <i>Pious Formations: The Islamic Revival and the Subject of Feminism</i>. (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, forthcoming);Carolyn Moxley  Rouse, <i>Engaged Surrender: African American Women and Islam</i>. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2004), 291 pp., $50.00;Mary  Keller, <i>The Hammer and the Flute: Women, Power and Spirit Possession</i>. (Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 2002), 289 pp., $44.00.

2004· article· en· W2108876258 on OpenAlexaff
Pamela E. Klassen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Religion · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTheological Perspectives and Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpiritualityReligious studiesPoliticsFeminismWifeSociologyArt historyTheologyArtHistoryMedia studiesGender studiesLawPhilosophyPolitical scienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.009
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ReligionSame topicTheological Perspectives and PracticesFrench-language works237,207