MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108961046 · doi:10.1115/fedsm-icnmm2010-30515

Active Control of Vortex Induced Vibration by Plasma Actuation

2010· article· en· W2108961046 on OpenAlexaff
Gh. Sari, Njuki Mureithi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlasma actuatorControl theory (sociology)VortexVibrationNonlinear systemActuatorMechanicsDielectric barrier dischargeVibration controlExperimental dataMaterials scienceAcousticsDielectricPhysicsComputer scienceMathematicsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the results of experiments on the elimination of vortex induced vibration (VIV) of a cylinder in cross-flow by using a simple active control method are reported. Motivated by new research, a Single Dielectric Barrier Discharge (SDBD) plasma actuator is used and the effect of steady and unsteady actuation demonstrated. The feasibility of the model parameters estimation was also studied in simulations by investigating the Fisher Information Matrix and the nonlinear numerical curve fitting methods applied to estimate identifiable parameters from experimental data. The efficiency of the control methods was found to be acceptable and simulation outcomes supported the experimental results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score0.356

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlasma and Flow Control in AerodynamicsFrench-language works237,207