MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Dynamic Spectrum Management for Multiple-Antenna Cognitive Radio Systems: Designs with Imperfect CSI

2011· article· en· W2108986278 on OpenAlex
Tariq Al-Khasib, Michael Botros Shenouda, Lutz Lampe

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitive radioComputer scienceConvex optimizationChannel state informationTransmitterMIMOMathematical optimizationLinear matrix inequalityOptimization problemChannel (broadcasting)PrecodingWirelessTelecommunicationsMathematicsAlgorithmRegular polygon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we study the problem of resource allocation and optimization for multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) cognitive radio (CR) systems under the assumption of imperfect channel state information (CSI) of the channels between the secondary users (SUs) and the primary users (PUs) at the SUs. We formulate robust design optimization problems for CR systems with one or more SUs communicating over a single or multiple frequency carriers in the presence of multiple PUs. We propose a linear matrix inequality (LMI) transformation that facilitates proper treatment of channel uncertainty at the SU transmitter and we provide solutions to the design problems based on convex optimization and Lagrange dual decomposition techniques. Finally, we demonstrate the importance of the proposed formulations and the implications of ignoring channel uncertainties when designing for CR systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it