MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108991730 · doi:10.3139/146.101555

Thermodynamic modeling of the B<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>–SiO<sub>2</sub> and B<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>–Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> systems

2007· article· en· W2108991730 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Materials Research (formerly Zeitschrift fuer Metallkunde) · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiquidusMaterials scienceThermodynamicsPhase diagramThermodynamic processOxideThermodynamic databases for pure substancesCALPHADPhase (matter)Material propertiesChemistryMetallurgyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A complete literature review, critical evaluation, and thermodynamic modeling of the phase diagrams and thermodynamic properties of all oxide phases in the binary systems B 2 O 3 – SiO 2 and B 2 O 3 – Al 2 O 3 have been performed. The molten oxide is described by the Modified Quasichemical Model. Discrepancies in the available experimental data have been resolved and an optimized set of self-consistent thermodynamic functions of all phases has been obtained. This thermodynamic database can be used with the FactSage TM thermodynamic computing system to calculate all thermodynamic properties and phase equilibria from 25 °C to above the liquidus temperatures at 1 atm of total pressure and over the entire composition range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0060.003
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it