MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109004998 · doi:10.2514/6.2004-3591

Detonation Transfer of Insensitive High Explosive Assemblies Through a Bulged Closure Disc

2004· article· en· W2109004998 on OpenAlex
Donald R. Jackson, William Thorup, Lien C. Yang, Greg Dougherty, Kenyon Orme

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergetic Materials and Combustion
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExplosive materialDetonationClosure (psychology)Materials scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extensive investigation of a very rare bulged closure disc phenomenon was performed on the Titan IV Solid Rocket Motor Upgrade, SRMU, Linear Shaped Charge Assembly (LSCA) following a Lot Acceptance Test anomaly. The steel disc, spanning over a Hexanitrostilbene (HNS) load in a Transfer Charge, was approximately 0.101-mm (0.004-in.) thick and the bulge was on the order of 0.635-mm (0.025-in.) high with a diameter of 5.79 mm (0.228 inch). The charge provides the interface between an HNS loaded end-tip of a confined detonating cord and the linear-shaped charge. The bulge developed in three lot acceptance test samples, during dynamic testing. Possible causes of this anomaly were identified. A theoretical analysis and a thorough testing series were performed to evaluate the effect of the condition on the detonation transfer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it