MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109033117 · doi:10.1190/geo2011-0478.1

Interpretation of 2D seismic profiles in complex geological terrains: Examples from the Flin Flon mining camp, Canada

2012· article· en· W2109033117 on OpenAlexaffabout
Don White, M. Malinowski

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyInterpretation (philosophy)TerrainWorkflowSeismologyTRACE (psycholinguistics)Mining engineeringComputer scienceCartographyDatabaseGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT A methodology was demonstrated for the 3D interpretation of networks of 2D seismic profiles in conjunction with other 3D geological constraints. The methodology employs 3D migration of 2D seismic data as a means of directly correlating reflections with out-of-plane geology, followed by ray-trace modeling of interpreted 3D geological surfaces. The proposed interpretation workflow was demonstrated with examples taken from 2D seismic profiles that were recently acquired for VMS ore exploration within the Flin Flon mining camp, Canada. In each example, the utility of the method was demonstrated and the resulting inferences were validated by comparison with a true 3D seismic survey acquired over a subset of the same area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.224
Threshold uncertainty score0.443

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicGeological Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207