MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109053735 · doi:10.1109/lcn.1991.208111

The topology component of protocol performance

2002· article· en· W2109053735 on OpenAlexaff
W. Dobosiewicz, Paweł Gburzyński

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer networkComputer scienceProtocol (science)ThroughputNetwork topologyTopology (electrical circuits)Component (thermodynamics)Network packetObject (grammar)Focus (optics)Distributed computingMathematicsWirelessArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsCombinatoricsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper demonstrates that the performance of MAC-level protocols is not very meaningful, when considered alone. The true object of performance analysis should be the pair (T,P), where T stands for network topology, and P for MAC-level protocol. The paper examines the performance of two MAC-level protocols: DQDB and LCSMA-CD/U/P. As both of them are capacity-1 protocols, they achieve the same maximum throughput; thus, the focus is on the packet access time and on fairness. The investigation shows that either protocol can be shown as greatly unfair or totally fair, depending on the topology that it operates on. As a byproduct, it is shown that the UU-BUS topology is quite interesting and merits further studies.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.606
Threshold uncertainty score0.122

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Networks and ProtocolsFrench-language works237,207