Approximate K-D tree search for efficient ICP
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A method is presented that uses an approximate nearest neighbor method for determining correspondences within the iterative closest point algorithm. The method is based upon the k-d tree. The standard k-d tree uses a tentative backtracking search to identify nearest neighbors. In contrast, the approximate k-d tree (Ak-d tree) applies a depth-first nontentative search to the k-d tree structure. This search improves runtime efficiency, with the tradeoff of reducing the accuracy of the determined correspondences. This approximate search is applied to early iterations of the iterative closest point algorithm, transitioning to the standard k-d tree for the final iterations after the change in the mean square error of the correspondences becomes sufficiently small. The method benefits both from the improved time performance of the approximate search in early iterations as well as the full accuracy of the complete search in later iterations. Experimental results indicate that the time efficiency of Ak-d tree is superior to the k-d tree and Elias for moderately large point sets. The change in the shape of the minimum potential well space is subtle, and the convergence properties are often identical. In those cases where the global minimum was not achieved, the difference in final mse was very small. In one trial, Ak-d tree converged faster to a better minimum with a smaller mse, which indicates that the use of approximate methods may be beneficial in the presence of outliers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it