MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109065152 · doi:10.1109/twc.2006.1618935

CCS-FOSSIL and dual-channel system that increases channel capacity per dynamic power range

2006· article· en· W2109065152 on OpenAlexaff
D. Lee, Lih-feng Tsaur

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChannel (broadcasting)Sequence (biology)Code division multiple accessComputer scienceTree (set theory)MathematicsChannel capacityCode (set theory)AlgorithmTelecommunicationsCombinatoricsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We design a forest with nodes that represent orthogonal variable spreading factor (OVSF) sequences of different lengths (spreading codes of different lengths that can be used for multi-rate DS-CDMA). In addition to the non-descendant OVSF property exhibited in well-known tree-structured generation of sequences [(F. Adachi, et al., 1997) and (E.H. Dinan and B. Jabbari, 1998)], the sequences represented by the nodes of our forest have useful properties that can be used to achieve multi-channel communication (with a sequence providing a channel) with a lower total peak-to-mean envelope power ratio (PMEPR). These OSVF sequences grouped by our forest structure also have properties that facilitate symbol-by-symbol adaptation of the symbol duration in multi-rate CDMA systems. For example, certain lineages in the forest have the property that any pair of code sequences in the same lineage are shift orthogonal to each other, with the unit shift length being that of the shorter sequence. We present the forest-structured generation of the sequences (spreading codes) and their properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.908
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207