MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109073735 · doi:10.1109/apec.2014.6803458

Average natural trajectories (ANTs) for boost converters: Centric-based control

2014· article· en· W2109073735 on OpenAlexaff
Ignacio Galiano Zurbriggen, Martin Ordonez

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvertersControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceController (irrigation)Operating pointBandwidth (computing)Pulse-width modulationElectronic engineeringControl engineeringEngineeringControl (management)Voltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The control of boost converters using traditional linear techniques features fixed switching frequency and a simple implementation. Due to its characteristic non-minimum phase behaviour, the dynamic response can be improved only to a limited extent. On the other hand, excellent dynamic performance can be achieved with boundary controllers in which the demands placed on processors and sensors are greatly increased. This work introduces a novel control technique for boost converters that combines pulse width modulation with geometrical analysis. The natural evolution of the converter averaged state variables is modeled in a geometrical domain, and employed to develop a non-linear control scheme. The proposed technique is suitable for implementation in low cost DSPs, using low bandwidth sensing stages, and it features fixed switching frequency, fast dynamic response, and low computational burden. These characteristics make the controller a very appealing alternative for high-volume applications. The issues related to the RHPZ in the small signal model of the converter are eliminated due to the geometric-based nature of the proposed control technique, and therefore fast dynamic response can be achieved. Furthermore, since the model developed predicts large-signal behaviour accurately, reliable and predictable behaviour can be obtained at any operating point. In this way, magnetic saturation and system failures can be avoided even during extremely large transients. The contributions made to the theoretical and applied field are valid for any combination of reactive components due to the normalized approach adopted. The theoretical concepts are supported by detailed mathematical procedures and the controller's implementation validated by experimental results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.859

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207