MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109143339 · doi:10.1109/vetecf.2002.1040549

A generalized simplified ML decoder of orthogonal space-time block code for wireless communications over time-selective fading channels

2003· article· en· W2109143339 on OpenAlexaff
T.A. Tran, A.B. Sesay

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFadingComputer scienceSoft-decision decoderAlgorithmBlock codeChannel state informationDecoding methodsChannel (broadcasting)MIMOInterference (communication)Code (set theory)Upper and lower boundsWirelessElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a novel generalized simplified maximum-likelihood (ML) decoder of orthogonal space-time block code (OSTBC) for wireless communications over time-selective fading channels. The proposed decoder computes the decision statistics based on the channel state information (CSI) and completely removes the inter-transmit-antenna interference (ITAI) and provides diversity advantage when the channel varies from one signaling interval to another. It is shown that when the channel is quasi-static, the proposed decoder becomes the optimum ML decoder for OSTBC. We derive a tight theoretical upper bound for bit error probability of the proposed decoder. We show theoretically that the proposed decoder does not exhibit error floors at high signal-to-noise ratios (SNR). Simulation results for various channel-fading rates are presented to verify our theoretical analysis and demonstrate robust performance of the proposed decoder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207