Minimum BER transmit optimization for two-input multiple-output spatial multiplexing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A two-input multiple-output (TIMO) system represents an important special case of multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems and occurs in practical scenarios where there are limitations on cost and/or space to install more antennas, in MIMO with transmit antenna selection which selects two out of multiple transmit antennas and turns MIMO into TIMO, or in cooperative communications with two single-antenna mobiles sharing their antennas. In this paper, minimum bit error rate (MBER) transmit optimization for TIMO spatial multiplexing systems is investigated. Approximate MBER transmit power allocation for a variety of receiver structures is proposed. Transmit beamforming schemes using 4-ary pulse-amplitude-modulation (4-PAM) and quaternary phase-shift-keying (QPSK) pre-mixing are also proposed, which eliminate error floors in ill-conditioned TIMO channels. It is shown both analytically and by numerical simulations that the proposed schemes offer superior performance over existing schemes. Essentially, the proposed transmit optimization provides a simple and efficient means to utilize partial channel state information at the transmitter
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it