Dimorphism and a new record of<i>Barroisiceras</i>De Grossouvre (Ammonoidea) from the Coniacian of Bagh, central India
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Barroisiceras de Grossouvre was hitherto unknown in India. B. onilahyense Basse, which elsewhere belongs exclusively to the Coniacian, has been recorded from the Bryozoan Limestone Formation of central India. This find, as well as the presence of another time-diagnostic Coniacian ammonite, Placenticeras kaffrarium Etheridge and two inoceramid bivalves, Inoceramus (Mytiloides) incertus Jimbo and I. (Platyceramus) mantelli (Barrois) Mercey in the underlying horizons, help in resolving the long standing problem of the age of the Bagh Group. B. onilahyense shows wide intraspecific variability and overlaps morphometrically with the late Turonian type species, B. haberfellneri (Hauer). They may be conspecific. The present species has been found to be sexually dimorphic, a phenomenon previously not well recognised in the subfamily Barroisiceratinae. As in many Late Cretaceous ammonites, dimorphism is manifest mainly by differences in relative adult sizes and in strength of ornamentation, the microconch being smaller and more strongly ornamented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".