MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109194431 · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.491

421 UPPER URINARY TRACT UROTHELICAL CARCINOMA WITH LOCOREGIONAL NODAL METASTASES: EXPERIENCE WITH AGGRESSIVE INTEGRATION OF SYSTEMIC THERAPY FOLLOWED BY RADICAL NEPHROURETERECTOMY

2010· article· en· W2109194431 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ramy F. Youssef, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Yair Lotan, Christopher Wood, Arthur I. Sagalowsky, Richard Zigeuner, Eiji Kikuchi, Alon Z. Weizer, Jay D. Raman, Mesut Remzi, Marco Roscigno, Francesco Montorsi, Christian Bolenz, Wassim Kassouf, Vitaly Margulis

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Urology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary and Genital Oncology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGeneral surgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

You have accessJournal of UrologyUrothelial Cancer: Upper Tract Tumors1 Apr 2010421 UPPER URINARY TRACT UROTHELICAL CARCINOMA WITH LOCOREGIONAL NODAL METASTASES: EXPERIENCE WITH AGGRESSIVE INTEGRATION OF SYSTEMIC THERAPY FOLLOWED BY RADICAL NEPHROURETERECTOMY Ramy Youssef, Shahrokh Shariat, Yair Lotan, Christopher Wood, Arthur Sagalowsky, Richard Zigeuner, Eiji Kikuchi, Alon Weizer, Jay Raman, Mesut Remzi, Marco Roscigno, Francesco Montorsi, Christian Bolenz, Wassim Kassouf, and Vitaly Margulis Ramy YoussefRamy Youssef Dallas, TX More articles by this author , Shahrokh ShariatShahrokh Shariat Dallas, TX More articles by this author , Yair LotanYair Lotan Dallas, TX More articles by this author , Christopher WoodChristopher Wood Houston, TX More articles by this author , Arthur SagalowskyArthur Sagalowsky Dallas, TX More articles by this author , Richard ZigeunerRichard Zigeuner Graz, Austria More articles by this author , Eiji KikuchiEiji Kikuchi Tokyo, Japan More articles by this author , Alon WeizerAlon Weizer Ann Arbor, TX More articles by this author , Jay RamanJay Raman New York, NY More articles by this author , Mesut RemziMesut Remzi Vienna, Austria More articles by this author , Marco RoscignoMarco Roscigno Milan, Italy More articles by this author , Francesco MontorsiFrancesco Montorsi Milan, Italy More articles by this author , Christian BolenzChristian Bolenz Mannheim, Germany More articles by this author , Wassim KassoufWassim Kassouf Montreal, Cape Verde More articles by this author , and Vitaly MargulisVitaly Margulis Dallas, TX More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.491AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Based on experience with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) of the urinary bladder, neoadjuvant systemic therapy is an attractive treatment paradigm for patients with UC of the upper urinary tract. Herein we describe a multi-center experience with administration of neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy in upper tract UC (UTUC) patients with loco-regional nodal metastases. METHODS We selected 313 patients from UTUC Collaboration (over 1200 patients), who underwent radical nephro-ureterctomy (RNU) with concomitant retroperitoneal lymph node dissection between 1990 and 2007 and met the criteria for one of 3 groups. Group 1 comprised patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy before RNU due to biopsy proven loco-regional metastases. Group 2 consisted of patients who underwent primary RNU and were found to have metastatic nodal disease on final pathologic review. Group 3 comprised a comparative cohort of patients treated with primary RNU for locally advanced (pT2/pT4) node negative UTUC. RESULTS Group 1, 2 and 3 included 18, 120 and 175 patients respectively. The 5 year disease-free survival rate was 49%, 30% and 64%, while the 5 year cancer specific survival rate was 44%, 36%and 69% in groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively. In group 1, on final pathological evaluation 9 patients (50 %) were pN0, 6 patients (33%) were pT0 and 5 patients (28%) had pT0pN0 disease. Kaplan-Meyer survival analyses demonstrated similar recurrence and survival rates in group 1 compared to group 3 (p=0.14 and 0.06, respectively). Meanwhile, group 2 had significantly inferior recurrence and survival rates compared to group 3 (p<0.001 and <0.001, respectively) and compared to group 1 (p=0.04 and 0.06, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Neoadjuvant systemic therapy followed by aggressive surgical consolidation may improve the oncologic outcome in UTUC patients with regional nodal metastases. This data supports further evaluation of neoadjuvant systemic therapy in patients with locally advanced UTUC. © 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 183Issue 4SApril 2010Page: e166 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Ramy Youssef Dallas, TX More articles by this author Shahrokh Shariat Dallas, TX More articles by this author Yair Lotan Dallas, TX More articles by this author Christopher Wood Houston, TX More articles by this author Arthur Sagalowsky Dallas, TX More articles by this author Richard Zigeuner Graz, Austria More articles by this author Eiji Kikuchi Tokyo, Japan More articles by this author Alon Weizer Ann Arbor, TX More articles by this author Jay Raman New York, NY More articles by this author Mesut Remzi Vienna, Austria More articles by this author Marco Roscigno Milan, Italy More articles by this author Francesco Montorsi Milan, Italy More articles by this author Christian Bolenz Mannheim, Germany More articles by this author Wassim Kassouf Montreal, Cape Verde More articles by this author Vitaly Margulis Dallas, TX More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.508
Threshold uncertainty score0.435

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of UrologySame topicUrinary and Genital Oncology StudiesFrench-language works237,207