MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109228421 · doi:10.1091/mbc.e03-03-0179

Superoxide Dismutases in<i>Candida albicans</i>: Transcriptional Regulation and Functional Characterization of the Hyphal-induced<i>SOD5</i>Gene

2003· article· en· W2109228421 on OpenAlexafffund
Mikhail Martchenko, Anne‐Marie Alarco, Doreen Harcus, Malcolm Whiteway

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Biology of the Cell · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntifungal resistance and susceptibility
Canadian institutionsBiotechnology Research InstituteMcGill University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCandida albicansBiologySuperoxide dismutaseSOD2MicrobiologyCorpus albicansVirulenceSOD1SuperoxideMutantTranscription factorReactive oxygen speciesMolecular biologyGeneBiochemistryOxidative stressEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Superoxide dismutases (SOD) convert superoxide radicals into less damaging hydrogen peroxide. The opportunistic human pathogen Candida albicans is known to express CuZnSOD (SOD1) and MnSOD (SOD3) in the cytosol and MnSOD (SOD2) in the mitochondria. We identified three additional CuZn-containing superoxide dismutases, SOD4, SOD5, and SOD6, within the sequence of the C. albicans genome. The transcription of SOD5 was up-regulated during the yeast to hyphal transition of C. albicans, and SOD5 was induced when C. albicans cells were challenged with osmotic or with oxidative stresses. SOD5 transcription was also increased when cells were grown on nonfermentable substrates as the only carbon source. The Rim101p transcription factor was required for all inductions observed, whereas the Efg1p transcription factor was specifically needed for serum-modulated expression. Deletion of SOD5 produced a viable mutant strain that showed sensitivity to hydrogen peroxide when cells were grown in nutrient-limited conditions. Sod5p was found to be necessary for the virulence of C. albicans in a mouse model of infection. However, the sod5 mutant strain showed the same resistance to macrophage attack as its parental strain, suggesting that the loss of virulence in not due to an increased sensitivity to macrophage attack.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.289
Threshold uncertainty score0.218

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations285
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Biology of the CellSame topicAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityFrench-language works237,207