Evaluation of systemic lupus erythematosus activity during pregnancy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to our increasing knowledge on the pathophysiological basis of autoimmunity and the development of combined medical-obstetric clinics, pregnancy is becoming common among women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, whether lupus worsens during pregnancy continues to be a controversial issue. SLE assessment during pregnancy is sometimes difficult due to physiological changes during this period, and common tools for measuring lupus activity during pregnancy were not available until recently. Several lupus activity scales in common use have been adapted for pregnancy [systemic lupus erythematosus in pregnancy activity index (SLEPDAI), modified lupus activity measurement (m-SLAM) and lupus activity index in pregnancy (LAI-P)]. All of them take into account the influence of pregnancy on clinical manifestation and common biochemical tests. LAI-P also accounts for specific manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome in order not to score them as due to SLE activity. LAI-P has recently been validated for use in SLE pregnancy and could be used in future studies. However, daily assessment and management of individual pregnant women with lupus still relies on the clinical skills of attending physicians.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".