Evidence for Holocene Marine Transgression and Shoreline Progradation Due to Barrier Development in Iskele, Bay of Izmir, Turkey
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study addresses the paleogeographic coastal evolution of the coastal plain in the environs of Iskele, Turkey. Eight sediment cores were collected along a north–south and east–west transect and analyzed to determine whether the coastal environment had changed in the recent past. The results illustrate that the coastal environment consisted of a transgressive systems tract, ending approximately 6000 BP and represented by marine transgression, flooding of incised river channels, and marsh development, followed by a high stand systems tract. Five major environmental facies were identified: terrestrial, wetland, lagoon, foreshore, and upper shoreface. The high stand systems tract was characterized by the development of a beach-barrier consecutive series of longshore transport-derived sandbars. These sandbars contributed to the creation and eventual isolation and terrestrial infilling of nearshore lagoons and wetlands. Sea-level indicators indicate rapid sea-level rise reaching a peak approximately 6000 YBP, followed by deceleration of sea-level rise and resulting shoreline progradation. The construction of a causeway connecting Karantina Island to the mainland approximately 2400 years ago has accelerated the process of progradation east of the causeway by decreasing the wave energy. Sediment that would have previously been transported further east is now deposited in the zone immediately east of the causeway.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it