MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2109268875 · doi:10.7202/704152ar

L'adhésion du Canada à I'OÉA: la primauté des facteurs externes

2005· article· fr· W2109268875 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Gordon Mace

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes internationales · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sans être le geste le plus significatif parmi ceux posés à l'égard des Amériques à l'époque du gouvernement Mulroney, la décision défaire du Canada un membre à part entière de l'Organisation des États américains (OÉA) fut néanmoins un moment stratégique important dans les rapports Canada-Amériques. La littérature spécialisée a consacré un certain nombre d'études à l'examen de l'adhésion canadienne à I'OÉA et on y remarque que la plupart des analyses insistent sur les déterminants internes comme facteurs explicatifs principaux de la décision prise en 1989. Le propos central de cet article consiste à tenter de montrer que les déterminants internes exposés dans la littérature spécialisée n'auraient pu mener à la décision canadienne d'adhérer à I'OÉA sans une conjoncture internationale particulière dans la deuxième moitié des années 1980. C'est ce contexte international qui constitue la source principale d'explication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.316

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0120.010
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes internationales→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→