← all works
In Regard to Girinsky et al
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Canadian affiliationAn author listed a Canadian institution. This is the only route the usual frame has.
The three-model screen
all 1,000 screened works →All three models called this out of scope.
stratum: aff_core · design weight: 5595.24 (the sample is stratified; any rate computed without the weight is wrong)
Claude Opus 4.8OUT
genre: editorial/commentary
about Canada: no
confidence: low
Letter to the editor about a specific radiation oncology paper; no abstract, and the correspondence concerns a clinical study rather than research practice.
GPT-5.6 (high)T3 · adjacent, not in scope
genre: editorial/commentary
about Canada: no
confidence: high
A letter responding to another article is contextual scholarly communication.
Grok 4.5T3 · adjacent, not in scope
genre: editorial/commentary
about Canada: no
confidence: high
Letter to the editor responding to a clinical paper, contextual correspondence under the rubric.
Abstract
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database — OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
The record
- Venue
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
- Topic
- Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
- Field
- Medicine
- Canadian institutions
- University of Alberta
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- MedicineAsymptomaticCoronary artery diseaseInternal medicineCardiologyTask forceRadiologyRevascularizationMyocardial infarction
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- no