Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size NotesNotes1. Rem Koolhaas, Bruce Mau, and Office for Metropolitan Architecture, eds., S,M,L,XL (New York: Monacelli, 1995), 497.2. Reinier de Graaf, “Architecture Is Now a Tool of Capital, Complicit in a Purpose Antithetical to Its Social Mission,” Architectural Review (April 25, 2015), http://www.architectural-review.com/essays/architecture-is-now-a-tool-of-capital-complicit-in-a-purpose-antithetical-to-its-social-mission/8681564.article.3. S,M,L,XL (note 1), 502.4. Ellen Dunham-Jones, “Irrational Exuberance: Rem Koolhaas and the 1990s,” in Architecture and Capitalism: 1845 to the Present, ed. Peggy Deamer (London: Routledge, 2014), 154–55.5. Leigh Claire La Berge, “The Rules of Abstraction Methods and Discourses of Finance,” Radical History Review 118 (Winter 2014): 93–112, doi:10.1215/01636545-2349133.6. Brett Steele, “Getting Real,” in Real Estates: Life without Debt, ed. Fulcrum (Jack Self and Shumi Bose) (London: Bedford, 2014), 129.Additional informationNotes on contributorsSara StevensSara Stevens is an architectural and urban historian and holds a PhD in the history, theory, and criticism of architecture and urbanism from Princeton University. She is an assistant professor of architectural and urban design history at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver. Her research focuses on American real estate developers of the twentieth century, exploring the cultural economy of architectural practice, risk, and expertise. Her book, Developing Expertise: Real Estate and Architecture in Metropolitan America (Yale University Press, forthcoming), studies real estate development in twentieth-century American cities, and how developers, investors, and architects worked together to build subdivisions and superblocks, cul-de-sacs and towers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it