MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109432300 · doi:10.7202/1022708ar

Les facteurs prédisposant à la réussite éducative dès la petite enfance

2014· article· fr· W2109432300 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Gilles Cantin, Caroline Bouchard, Nathalie Bigras

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des sciences de l éducation · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEarly Childhood Education and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’éducation à la petite enfance fait l’objet d’une attention de plus en plus grande dans la communauté scientifique. L’importance des apprentissages réalisés au cours de cette période est maintenant largement reconnue, notamment en regard de la réussite éducative des enfants. Dans cette perspective, au fil des dernières années, diverses conceptions au sujet de la préparation à l’école et à la vie ont balisé les travaux de recherche. Ces dernières années, une perspective écosystémique a été adoptée par nombre de chercheurs. Dans une telle perspective, divers facteurs tant proximaux que distaux sont à considérer pour comprendre, mais aussi mettre en place des interventions soutenant la réussite éducative. Ce texte introduit les divers articles regroupés dans ce numéro thématique portant sur les facteurs prédisposant à la réussite éducative dès la petite enfance. Il présente un survol de divers enjeux et travaux de recherche reconnus dans ce domaine afin de mettre la table en vue d’une réflexion approfondie sur cette problématique à la fois complexe et préoccupante.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.205
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue des sciences de l éducationSame topicEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207