MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109443383 · doi:10.1109/glocom.1996.594444

Performance evaluation of connection admission control techniques in ATM networks

2002· article· en· W2109443383 on OpenAlexaff
Bilel Jamoussi, S. Rabie, Osama Aboul‐Magd

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsNortel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsynchronous Transfer ModeQuality of serviceComputer networkCall Admission ControlComputer scienceAdmission controlAdaptation (eye)ATM adaptation layerAsynchronous communicationTelecommunicationsWireless networkWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Connection admission control (CAC) is a common traffic management technique used in asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) networks to provide quality of service (QoS) guarantees. We describe the requirements of CAC algorithms, and present an overview of existing CAC models. Then, we introduce a real-time adaptation of the extended Gibbens-Hunt (EGH) CAC method proposed in 1993 and compare its performance against other competing strategies using the Buffet and Duffield (1993) bound as a reference. Our results show that the EGH is a superior CAC technique that guarantees the QoS while offering the highest link utilization possible. The EGH is the CAC algorithm of choice for Nortel Magellan Passport and Concorde ATM switches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score0.301

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207